Enforcement is tightening faster than rules are changing
April 20, 2026By Seawork Press FP
Star International
Share this article
Onboard inspections are tightening, and vessel operators across the commercial marine sector are feeling the pressure. Inspectors are focused less on paperwork and more on how systems actually perform.
While compliance has traditionally been treated as a matter of certification and periodic servicing, industry developments suggest a different shift is underway. Enforcement is now placing greater emphasis on demonstrable system performance, condition, and testing history.
This shift reflects wider industry direction following recent discussions at the International Maritime Organization Sub-Committee on Ship Systems and Equipment (SSE 12), along with guidance from classification societies such as Lloyd’s Register. These developments point towards more detailed inspections and greater emphasis on system condition, testing, and documentation.
They also reflect the changing risk profile onboard, with increased focus on areas such as lithium battery hazards, alternative fuels, and evolving fire risks on modern vessels.
According to Star International, this change is already starting to affect how vessels are assessed in practice. Matt Ball, CEO at Star International, says, “Historically, compliance has often been managed around inspection dates, with maintenance activity concentrated in the run-up to surveys.
“What we are seeing now is a move away from that. Enforcement is tightening faster than rules are changing. Inspectors want to see that systems are consistently maintained, properly tested, and ready to perform at any time, not just compliant on paper.”
“In practical terms, there is less room for reactive fixes,” Ball adds. “Operators need to be able to demonstrate that systems are properly maintained on an ongoing basis, and that they are fit for the risks vessels are operating with today.”
For operators still relying on fragmented servicing or reactive maintenance, this shift introduces a number of practical challenges.
Unaligned servicing schedules, multiple contractors, and gaps in documentation can make it difficult to present a clear and consistent picture of system readiness. In a more stringent inspection environment, these gaps are more likely to be exposed.
In response, Star International is seeing a growing number of operators move towards more structured maintenance strategies, aligning servicing across systems and maintaining continuous inspection readiness.
By co-ordinating inspection, servicing, and supply, operators can improve visibility of system condition, reduce duplication of onboard visits, and maintain a more consistent compliance record across the vessel.
This approach also reduces reliance on last-minute interventions, which are becoming harder to manage as expectations tighten.
Star International recommends operators review their servicing schedules against current inspection expectations well ahead of their next survey.
“The operators in the strongest position are the ones who treat compliance as an ongoing process, not a point-in-time event,” says Ball. “That is where we are seeing the real difference now.”
